🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours prior to the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – not just the winner overall, and precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of well-known figure this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win while failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters leaned toward the independent, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

What was your night?

I had to do that because they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the system every few minutes! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate led the initial ballots by 12 points, but came two big batches of ballots added later and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world in which yesterday turned out somewhat badly for him, in which the opponent was going to end up basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However the winner added 500,000 votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Additionally he further maximized his core of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse, young, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump last year went for the progressive this year. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the record participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought it could exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still around 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he achieves it because then none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any borough. Not even Tottenville in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really surprised me. Cuomo kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and plus gained many Republicans on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I believe there was a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

I think existed some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and residents all went for the independent. So there was a little resistance. However overall, largely the leftist base is a key factor why Mamdani won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the election we reported on whether Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will the commie corridor serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – candidates will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that each urban center in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – because they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.